On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:37 AM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > o this is what I was trying to get done. > >> I do not know if what you propose (which can be better than what I was >>> planning) requires to change fileSystem, my goal was not to change for >>> now but just make sure that I can get cheaply file to print themselves >>> into kind of objects I can manipulate again. >>> >>> Now if what you propose is better, then first we should introduce a >>> logic to handle :file :memory >>> >>> And I'm not against so plese push it but this is outside of my little >>> goal for now. >>> >> You're right. Your solution is much simpler - therefore I'd go with your >> solution for now. >> >> would be nice. Push this idea. Once the community agrees then we can >>> easily extend the printOn: behavior. >>> >> I'll try to work through the FS code and see if I can get the stuff I'm >> thinking about implemented. >> > Please :) > I like the idea of URI for everything
Do you mean a URI represented as a String or as a URI object? I expect the former since ultimately pintOn: is called by printString, but I wanted to be clear? cheers -ben > > >> Did you watch the excellent talk of marcus at ESUG? >>> Because I think incrementally >>> >> One of the first videos/slidedecks I watched - the title made me curious. >> My key take-away is that it's better to implement the >> cheap/simple/non-perfect enhancement now than never (too late) the perfect >> one. >> > > :) > > > > >
