If anybody ever did an `apt-cache search name` it will be clear that having a good, concise, intention revealing package name is better than having a sophisticated one. I don't see how in Pharo catalogs and other discovery/browsing mechanisms it would be different.
Best regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2017-02-24 7:34 GMT-03:00 Markus Fritsche <mfrits...@reauktion.de>: > Hello, > > I guess the vote is already cast, but I'd like to add my two Cents: > > the packages now have a description that give an idea about what the package > is supposed to do. Still, discoverability should be considered when finding > a name. That's why I would prefer something like TelePharo, since the name > already hints at the core functionality. > > Best regards, > Markus > > > Am 29.01.2017 15:14, schrieb stepharong: >> >> Hi guys >> >> Since we will push the remote tools (videos/web...) I would like to >> get some ideas for a cool name. >> Any ideas? >> >> Because Pharmide (looks like medicine or chemical product). >> Since I vaguely remember some german Pharmide made me think about >> Fern(sehen) but this is not a good name. >> >> Stef >> >> >> -- > >
