I see in 60467 that the deed is done. Okay, so moving forward... be
prepared ;) for a surge of feedback as a bunch of us
dark-theme-newbies start using it in earnest. I understand those that
been using it a while already are obviously happy with how its tuned,
and probably not many things can be accommodated, but there is one
thing...
Maybe its that its 1AM, or its my astigmatism, but my first impression
was a shock at the high contrast pure-white-on-black text - for the
World Menu and System Browser - to the degree that my eyes felt
crosseyed. Particularly the title-bar-text was jarring. Dimming it
slightly made it *much* easier to focus. Could
dark-theme-connoisseurs try this out...
Pharo3DarkTheme>>textColor
^ Color veryLightGray lighter
And wow! That very bright green in TestRunner hurts.
Other than that, so far it looks cool.
cheers -ben
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Stephane Ducasse
<stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the mooc we have normally an image: it is called Pharo 50.
>
> S.
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Mark Bestley <news{@bestley.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > --001a113a8620c74f7a054d5aba55
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> >
>> > Not before IMMEDIATELY realizing that all screenshots containing the
>> > white
>> > theme are outdated and will IMMEDIATELY prefer the dark ones that will
>> > have
>> > an updated view of the Pharo GUI compared to a screenshot that has the
>> > white theme and it's outdated by two or more years.
>> >
>>
>> No they will think it is for a different environment and waste time
>> looking for a match.
>>
>> A beginner won't see that just that they cannot get the same answer as
>> the mooc or documentation.
>>
>> They will look for a language where the documentation matches what they
>> get as they don't know if the documentation or their code is wrong. (and
>> probably cast aspersions on the quality of what they are using)
>>
>> > Updating the screenshots for PBE5 was a big pain and I am sure there are
>> > ones that are left that are still outdated showing 1.4 , which is at
>> > least
>> > 6 years old.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
