> Am 19.09.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the question :). > > Indeed, the summary of Stef is quite good. > > Here are some additions: > - Indeed, Bloc gets stable. Recently, we learned that we can optimize the > layouts even more and Alex Syrel will work on that in the next couple of > weeks, but this will not impact users.
can't this be done later? I would prefer that making Bloc and Brick usable is the first target. Norbert > - We have just finished an alpha version of the editor that is both moldable > and scalable. It’s alpha because there are still things to fine tune in the > area of selection, insertion and deletion. > - Having an editor is significant step because it is the most expensive (and > the riskiest) widget mechanism. > - After the layouts and editor we will focus on the model for interaction and > animation of widgets and play with various classes of applications. > - In the meantime, Theo Mugnier worked with Alain Plantec and did a brilliant > job at providing an initial version of a SVG import-export. There are still > things to do, but this is really cool work. > > I prefer to not go into estimations because I prefer to allow for the space > to build crazy things, but we will work intensively on Bloc and Brick over > the coming months, likely well into next year. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > >> On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Torsten >> >> I will let Doru present it in more detail but I think that he is in vacation. >> Now here is my take from the discussion I got at ESUG. >> >> - Bloc is getting stable and people should really start to use it. >> This is why we did the bloc tutorial. We need more on that front. >> I plan to use it for some projects >> during the lectures I will give at Prague. >> BTW I would like to have a turtle for my new book. :) >> >> - Brick >> The text editor was a really important element to build widgets. >> The text editor model is basically the second iteration based on >> TxText attempt. >> It scales well. >> >> As soon as we start to have widgets we should do a Spec mapping >> and see how we can get rid of the middle man (the adapter should not >> be used at runtime). >> >> Bloc and Brick are not on the Pharo 70 roadmap because the process >> should be fixed before. >> But we would love to have bloc and brick as preview. >> >> Esteban is currently working with Ronnie for the SDL integration, >> headless image and others. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bergmann <asta...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> what is the current status of Bloc and Brick? >>> How likely is it that Bloc goes into Pharo 7? >>> >>> Anyone able to give a short update on current work >>> and plans? >>> >>> Thanks >>> T. >>> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "We are all great at making mistakes."
