> On 31 May 2019, at 08:18, Shaping <shap...@uurda.org> wrote: > > May I suggest that you ask clear questions if you want to engage nice people > to help you. > > That sounds reasonable. Which questions weren’t clear?
The first one where you were reported something I still cannot understand. > > Now we as a community will not use Monticello/smalltalkhub anymore > > Then officially Monticello is deprecated? Yes > We are all moving to git and iceberg is really nicely working. Iceberg will > get a bit more love in the future in Pharo 80. > > I’m looking forward to it. > > Now we spent around 1.5 years to build it and the 450 pharo packages are > managed with Iceberg > and many other projects so it works. We will probably improve iceberg again. > > > We will try to make sure that we can still load MC package but since MC > package are merely > zipped files you will be able to load them by loading the st file. > > Or should we just organize MC/zipping/unzipping abilities under Iceberg, and > call it the one-stop source management tool for Pharo and all Smalltalks that > want to interact with it? Is that the slow drift? No. Use iceberg and tonel format. > > Now this is not Pharo fault if you load a project that did not create a > stable version of Pharo7.0. > > Sure, but I’m crashing the VM, not hurting any project’s code in the image. This is another problem and we really to understand and see how we can fix it. > > If a baseline says “load latest version” then why iceberg would load only > Pharo 70 version? > > I don’t recall the “load latest version” qualifier. There is none this is the default in git. > So now you can get frustrated and confused. > But did you read the booklet on how to manage code in Pharo70? > books.pharo.org <http://books.pharo.org/> > > Which book are you referring to here? I will let you guess. :) > > > Did you check the wiki and the documentation? > > Yes, some. I’m thinking it’s Smalltalk and shouldn’t be that hard in any > case. But there is a lot of Git here, and that is complicating things > somewhat. sure it is but it also give us visibility scalability branch less foreign from other dev and monticello was a good soldier but it should rest now. > > > Shaping