On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Brad Fuller wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Stéphane >> Ducasse<stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >>> Hi brad >>> No :) >>> We removed it ;) because it was a mess >>> but I would like to have have a better one. >>> We could imagine morph to use a creation method with a pragma and >>> that a tool would query that pragma >>> and we could get the morph. >> >> I agree that it was messy, from my inexperienced skillset. I would >> love to have a way to create projects or books and populate with >> graphics and multimedia for presentations. Pharo looks so nice and it >> seems to run quickly (could be my mind though) that it would be great >> to use. > > we will remove BookMorph because it is a giant huge terrible mess. > Now if you want multimedia publishing or creation have you look at > openSophie?
I have looked at Sophie in a limited way.. First, it's Java now (hmmmm..) But, kidding aside, I didn't particularity like the way Sophie confined the space for objects. My perception might clearly be a result of my limited use of (Squeak) Sophie, perhaps John can steer me in the right direction. I also believe (Java) Sophie is just in alpha and Squeak Sophie is not maintained. I just liked the way I could create presentations in Squeak - it seemed open and I could create any new objects or tweak the old by adjusting code. -- Brad Fuller +1 (408) 335-0112 _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
