on the debugger front , Eliot has some fixes so that should move us forwards.
Cheers
mike

On Friday, September 4, 2009, Peter Hugosson-Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I went through all 1.0 items and changed those to 1.1 that I think are
> not that important. There are 24 issues left that I think need to be
> fixed before we can declare 1.0 final. Among them are a lot of
> debugger problems likely related to closures that may be hard to fix.
>
> Peter, one issue is "fix all failing tests". So we really want to "be
> green" for the release!
>
> Two other things we need to prepare is the one-click image (I think
> Marcus said he will look into this) and a secondary update stream that
> allows us to push maintenance changes to 1.0.x at the same time as we
> work on 1.1.
>
> So, there is still quite some work left...
>
> Adrian
>
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 08:52 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I suggest the following:
>>       we go over the bug tracker and move to 1.1 all the issues that are
>> not showstopper
>>       and we declare pharo 1.0 done
>>       and we open pharo 1.1 alpha
>>
>> Does it make sense to you?
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> Thanks Adrian, it's very good to know that my feelings are not against the 
> spirit of the project ;-)>
> --
> Cheers,
> Peter
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to