> 1) First of all, I don't like the PharoWeb name. Because it is not Web in > general, it is seaside. So, in my opinion, a better name would be > PharoSeaside. Maybe even new comers may think that the only alternative is > seaside. You know I have nothing against Seaside and that I even use it > several times. I would like to see AidaWeb images based in Pharo too.
I think at some point the images also contained AIDA. > 4) Now I created all the Metacello configurations for the PharoDev image and > I took me a lot of time. Because I am not the developer of any of those > projects. So, I need to understand the dependencies, the order, the > versions, etc. But why ??? If Seaside people have already done that, don't > duplicate efforts. There is a configuration for Seaside 3.0 (and probably also Seaside 2.8). This was probably the first configuration every written. Ask Dale. > 4) You may notice that Seaside images are a bit "different" than our Dev > images. This is mostly due to the preferences, the theme and maybe some > tools (ECompeltion instead of OCompletion, etc..). So, what I suggest is to > prepare a little script that can be downloadable and those people who want a > Seaside image but more "similar" to our Dev images, just run that script. They are different because they reflect my preferences. I basically build the Seaside images for me. If other people like and use these images, that's great of course. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
