Em 04/01/2010 06:24, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianop...@gmail.com > escreveu:
> Please, don't say "NOOOOO!" immediately. Read the mail carefully, > take a deep breath and think cold. > After working a couple of weeks in the Metacello configurations and > now with Damien's scripts to build Dev and Web images, I came to the > question: Do we really need a PharoWeb image? > I will give just my opinions of why having PharoWeb images is not > a good idea anymore [snipped] On the whole I appreciate and agree with the reasoning. > > Here is my proposal: > 1) Completely remove the idea of PharoWeb image. Remove the links > from the website and do not create Web images any more. +1 > 2) In http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download add a description > explaining that now Seaside images are based in Pharo, so you can > directly download that image. We can even explain a bit about > seaside, and even if you want you can put a href called "PharoWeb" > which links to the seaside image. However, I would rather call it > "PharoSeaside". I think here we have to work hard to stress this fact since IIUC the /pièce de résistance/ for Pharo is having all production work done by Seaside. > 3) Tomorrow we can have AidaWeb images based in > pharo (please Janko!!) so we can just do the same and put the link > to those images. While I'm fond of the idea on having AidaWeb very soon as possible, I also think we should put ourselves in Janko's shoes and understand that he'll need to master Metacelllo to arrive at the packaging. . . > 4) You may notice that Seaside images are a bit "different" than our > Dev images. This is mostly due to the preferences, the theme and > maybe some tools (ECompeltion instead of OCompletion, etc..). So, > what I suggest is to prepare a little script that can be > downloadable and those people who want a Seaside image but more > "similar" to our Dev images, just run that script. I would postpone the publishing of these kind of scripts for a much more stable Pharo and Metacello (or packaging solution ensuing), otherwise you'll have the same work as testing the scripts means creating and testing the packages!! > > So...what do you think? I would really like to hear your opinion > about this. my 0.01999999.... -- Cesar Rabak _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project