Miguel,
Pharo allows you to drill down to millisecond resolution, but for your
'benchmark' that's still too coarse:
{DateAndTime. TimeStamp } collect: [ :class |
| list |
list := OrderedCollection new.
1 to: 1000 do: [ :each |
value := class millisecondClockValue.
list add: value ].
list last - list first ].
I get an Array (1 1).
Changing from 1000 to 100000 (hundred fold) I got #(77 141).
HTH
--
Cesar Rabak
Em 12/02/2010 17:02, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez < miguel.c...@gmail.com >
escreveu:
I am noticing that both
DateAndTime now
TimeStamp now
have a precision of seconds, that is, the nanos is always 0.
I am doing a bulk data creation and inserting them in a list with a
timestamp for each insertion but this isn't working because several
entries have the very same DateAndTime or Timestamp.
For example:
{DateAndTime. TimeStamp } collect: [ :class |
| list |
list := OrderedCollection new.
1 to: 1000 do: [ :each |
value := class now.
list add: value ].
list last - list first ]
gives an Array(0:00:00:00 0:00:00:00)
How can achieve smaller than a second timestamping in Pharo?
--
Miguel Cobá
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
