On 13 March 2010 12:56, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > Igor wrote: >>Yes. Use right tool for to do job. >>An OrderedCollection can't satisfy every possible combination of >>tasks, which developer facing. > > So, these collections are currently missing. And as all current > code is bound to the current implementations, switching > implementation on size is the prefered approach. > If such kind of collections didn't existed over more than 30 years of smalltalk existance, what makes you think that there a big interest in having them today? Of course, they could occupy some niche, but i doubt that they will replace an existing classes in a day-to-day use. Besides, many projects implementing own kinds of collections, specific to their needs.
> Stephan > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
