2010/3/14 Levente Uzonyi <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> during the sprint niko schwarz and oscar nierstrasz fixed the Set in nil >> entry. >> Thanks. >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907 > > Why did you choose Igor's negative tally hack instead of the SetElement > version? >
I'd prefer to use SetElement, unless there was a decision made, to use negative tally. We had a quite big discussion around it on squeak-dev, and most developers said that SetElement is the way to go, because it is clean, OO-oriented, even if somewhat slower comparing to other approaches. > > Levente > >> >> Now does somebody with knowledge could have a look because this is a >> sensitive >> part of the system and more eyes does not hurt. >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
