so may be the bug entry should have stated that because oscar and nico spend a day on it.
Stef On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > On 15.03.2010 00:18, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> 2010/3/14 Levente Uzonyi<[email protected]>: >>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> during the sprint niko schwarz and oscar nierstrasz fixed the Set in nil >>>> entry. >>>> Thanks. >>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907 >>> Why did you choose Igor's negative tally hack instead of the SetElement >>> version? >>> >> I'd prefer to use SetElement, unless there was a decision made, to use >> negative tally. >> We had a quite big discussion around it on squeak-dev, and most >> developers said that SetElement >> is the way to go, because it is clean, OO-oriented, even if somewhat >> slower comparing to other approaches. >> > +1 > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
