On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Yes, if a test that is expected to fail does not fail, this is treated as a > failure. I think that makes sense.
well it depends about the scenario. you put on expectedfailures something that gets in your way now, so after if it works even better. of course you should get notified that the test is green while expected it to failed. Now it leads to a UI problem where you have a failure that passes so when you click on it nothing happens: no debugger. And you can wonder why the hell do I have a failure when my tests pass. So I think that this implementation of expectedFailures is a hack. > > Adrian > > On Apr 20, 2010, at 21:57 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I tagged some tests as expected failures and I got a strange behavior. >> On the the tests which was passing was listed under the failures. >> When I renamed the method without updating the expected failures my bar was >> green. >> So expected failures really expect that the tests failed? We cannto have >> green tests in there? >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
