On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/5/17 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > > <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> > >> check the network problem. > >> But we can release rc1 anytime now. > >> > > > > No, please. We are not in a RC yet. We should first go as alpha, then > beta > > and finally RC. > > We cannot go in a RC with the first build ever. > > > Yes , we can. Its only a conventions, what you calling alpha , beta or RC. > But sure thing, more testing and packaging won't hurt. > > But conventions are important. Listen the name: RELEASE CANDIDATE! Imagine you are going to download a software which is in RELEASE CANDIDATE and has a lot of problems and bugs....is not good for marketing. So...they are just conventions, but they are important. We cannot say this is a release candidate when we haven't even ever created a PharoDev. For example, did you test it? We are not speaking about core. > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
