ok so now this is exactly the VW windowspec and I understand why they did it like that. They have a declarative expression with multiple possible interpretations
I was not sure that literal inside arrays where in the literal frame but I was stupid. Stef > If performance is not a problem , then you could wrap things in one array, > like: > > array := #( > > ( #selector1 arg1 arg2 arg3) > ( #selector2 arg1 arg2 arg3) > ( #selector3 arg1 arg2 arg3) > ( #selector4 arg1 arg2 arg3) > ... > ) > > then in compiled method you'll have only a single literal - and outer > array, and everything else will sit within it: > > array do: [:msg | > container perform: msg first withArguments: msg allButFirst ] > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
