---- On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:18:19 -0700 Norbert Hartl wrote ----
> >But as I wrote in my description of the problem I would call it > >coalesceCDATASections: aBoolean > >or > >enableCoalescing >disableCoalescing The downside of enable/disable pairs is the need for three message (two to modify, one to test and lazily initialize) rather than two. >The functionality that is described here is better known as coalescing. And it >describes better what is going. If a parser is coalescing two things will >happen. CDATA sections will be read in as text nodes and then subsequent text >nodes are coalesing into a single text node. > >my 2 cents, > >Norbert I think "preserve" is better, if only because "coalesceCData" just implies a joining together of CDATA sections and says nothing about their status in the DOM tree as XMLString or XMLCData nodes. Although I am not wed to it. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
