How to navigate them?What model? Because this is not because you have namespace that you do not get name clash. How to use them in presence of package? What is the impact on tools? What do we want exactly? Do we want selector namespaces? No need to answer and I have a long list. I'm thinking about namespaces since we did classboxes and so far the anwser is not easy. Because I would like to have late bound class name but this may imply to see if we can avoid to have mixin. So I think that we have more urgent things to do now. The current need is easily solved by prefixing so let us prefix. Because what I want is to be able to reuse tests but with another Collection package and so far simple namespaces do not solve that and the solution I know is far to big and its impacts are big too. Stef
On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Miguel Cobá wrote: > >> I think the "No" answer is more like "there are no current plans, >> because nobody has pushed it" than "the namespaces implementation is >> banned from Pharo" > > > Or: Namespaces can be done so easily wrong so that oe needs to think very > carefully and > there are no braincycles left just now. > > At least, that's my view... and I think that the project indeed is very > important, as it shows one > solution that we can learn from... and then we can realize something for > Pharo after we > are sure we learned enough. > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > >
