+1 Alexandre
On 18 Mar 2011, at 16:16, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > How to navigate them?What model? Because this is not because you have > namespace that you do not get name clash. > How to use them in presence of package? What is the impact on tools? What do > we want exactly? Do we want selector namespaces? > No need to answer and I have a long list. > I'm thinking about namespaces since we did classboxes and so far the anwser > is not easy. > Because I would like to have late bound class name but this may imply to see > if we can avoid to have mixin. > So I think that we have more urgent things to do now. > The current need is easily solved by prefixing so let us prefix. > Because what I want is to be able to reuse tests but with another Collection > package and so far simple namespaces > do not solve that and the solution I know is far to big and its impacts are > big too. > Stef > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Miguel Cobá wrote: >> >>> I think the "No" answer is more like "there are no current plans, >>> because nobody has pushed it" than "the namespaces implementation is >>> banned from Pharo" >> >> >> Or: Namespaces can be done so easily wrong so that oe needs to think very >> carefully and >> there are no braincycles left just now. >> >> At least, that's my view... and I think that the project indeed is very >> important, as it shows one >> solution that we can learn from... and then we can realize something for >> Pharo after we >> are sure we learned enough. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
