2011/5/31 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > so I suggest that you just try to add optimalExtent based on minimal > it does not seem that an existing method compute what you want. > > For me I still did not clearly get it. It seems that you want the potential > space that a morph should occupy in > the space of its container? >
Yes :) > > Stef > On May 31, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > > I would like a method that always return something like the first result > (from the first example) , whatever the 'extending stratgies' of the > submorphs (in my two examples, both would return the 'first' result). > > > > 2011/5/30 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> > > cyrille > > > > I was rereading your mail and I could not really understand what you are > really looking for. > > > > Stef > > > > On May 20, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have a panelMorph composed by several row/columns with different kind > of morphs. > > > What I would like to know is, what is the extent / size that I should > use to FULLY display this panel (without scrollbars). > > > Each time I ask for the extent of a panelMorph, it answers 50@40, > whatever what is inside. If you openInWorld you will have something very > very small. > > > Is there a way to retrieve an extent with which the panel morph will be > 'well' displayed (without having scrollbars everywhere)? > > > > > > In other words, what I really want to know is: > > > Given two panelMorph, is there a way to say that one need more place > than the other to be displayed? > > > > > > > > > > > >
