Ok, please try to integrate this fix: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4533
-- Pavel On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > Because we removed the (attempt based on CUIS and fernando) due to too many > problem. > ThreadSafeTranscript was not removed we just linked back Transcript to this > class. > We did the same with 1.3 > So normally you should have the same problem with 1.3 and 1.4 > > Stef > >> Hi, >> >> why in the latest 1.4 image is ThreadSafeTranscript back? Wasn't it >> replaced by TranscriptModel? It breaks Pharo-Kernel CI job (it doesn't >> report fail but I will fix that). >> >> -- Pavel >> > > >
