Guido, Notwithstanding how useful would be to track these attributes you just mentioned, I cannot see how the graphs of the clusters shown in the earlier post can be either a representation of them nor even a summary of what you brought now in this comment. . .
Regards, -- Cesar Rabak Em 10/11/2011 18:44, Guido Stepken < gstep...@googlemail.com > escreveu: Project managers directly can *see*, how much brainpower each programmer is investing and in how far he really cleans up code, defines clear and usable (and used by other coprogrammers) interfaces, or he is messing up the code, producing even more work and costs for others. You know - "lines not written" -> but they directly show up in the graphs! Should be standard everywhere, IMHO. Have fun! Guido Stepken Am 10.11.2011 um 21:25 schrieb csra...@bol.com.br: > As the saying says: "Every person to its taste!", I will not delve in the > liking or not of the graphs, but I think the question must be posed: > > What practical measures can be extracted of such representation and how can > they be used to [help] fulfill the Pharo vision? > > -- > Cesar Rabak > > Em 09/11/2011 19:15, Guido Stepken < gstep...@googlemail.com > escreveu: > I like such things, like visualizing class dependencies with girvan newman > algorithm: > > http://igraph.sourceforge.net/screenshots2.html > > or here: > > http://www.little-idiot.de/teambuilding/apache-structure.pdf > > Should be nice to see, how Pharo has changed over time. > > Are there such "reflective tools" available in Pharo? (Should be pretty easy > to handover a list of Pharo class dependencies to igraph ...) > > Tnx, Guido Stepken > >
