On 2012-02-21, at 21:19, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Ben
>
> I like the suggestion of mariano and luc.
> I discussed with them.
>
> - opening by default on packages is better because it does not force
> you to display the full
> hierarchy.
=> add preference setting
>
> - could you try to see if you can just display the packages and
> hierarchy without swapping them?
=> add preference setting
>
> Stef
>>> One last thing: when you type the name of a class somewhere and you do a
>>> cmd+b I think it would be much better if Nautilus open the "normal" browser
>>> and not "hierarchy" one.
>>
>> having cmd+h for hierarchy would be great :)
>>
>> +9999999
>>
>> to open a hierarchy when you do cmd+b is bad for me beacuse:
>>
>> 1) 99% of the times I browse that way, I want to see that class, and 99%
>> also the rest of the classes of that package, not the hierarchy
>> 2) I am used to that since the last..mm 3 years ;)
>> 3) Because it seems the hierarchy windows is slow in big cases [Object
>> browse] timeToRun 19225 so it took me 20 seconds to open the window ;)
>>
>> Because of that, I much prefer cmd + to for a normal browse. I don't pretend
>> all agree, so I would be very happy when you have the setting. Please let me
>> know so that I can set it :)
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>>
>>
>> Ben we should produce a configuration because this is important.
>> What you can do is at least load the baseline and snapshot only when you
>> will release on version for 1.4 and 1.5
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Benjamin
>>> <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> To be honest, if it works, I do not want to lose my time on Configuration
>>>
>>>
>>> It shouldn't be done by hand, but generated by a tool :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Benjamin
>>>> <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>
>>>> I know a some of you are waiting for the integration of the RB engine into
>>>> Nautilus.
>>>>
>>>> Some of them are already implemented, so if you wanna test them, here is
>>>> the gofer script
>>>>
>>>> Gofer new
>>>> url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Nautilus';
>>>> package: 'ConfigurationOfNautilus';
>>>> load.
>>>>
>>>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring) perform: #loadDefault
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So...that's the way of loading Nautilus with refactorings? Wouldn't it
>>>> be better to include RB dependencis in ConfigurationOfNautilus and have a
>>>> specific group there. So you can do for example
>>>>
>>>> ConfigurationOfNautilus project stableVersion load: 'WithRefactorings'.
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I checked the ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring and it looks you
>>>> miss a critical feature of Metacello: project references :) From
>>>> ConfigurationOfNautilusRefactoring you can directly depend on
>>>> ConfigurationOfRB or ConfigurationOfNautilus rather than duplicating
>>>> everything in there. Don't tell Stef you didn't read the chapter hahahaha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It loads everything.
>>>>
>>>> For now I have only done some refactorings for classes, so if you popup
>>>> the menu on a class, a new item named Refactoring should appear :)
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, the 'rename class' method is replaced by the RB one :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for your feedback, and if you want to participate, you
>>>> are more than welcome :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mariano
>>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mariano
>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mariano
>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>
>
>
