On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Guido Stepken wrote: > > You might still laugh at me... i don't. > >
Not at you, just your way of trying to provoke a response. "Someone mentioned semaphores! Better link this article and tell them how it should be done!" without even checking if it's ontopic to the actual discussion. If you did, you'd find the use of semaphores in this case actually being close to what the paper describes as a compromise between mutex and spin lock used for interrupt processing. "What, he didn't bite, FIRE ALL CANNONS WITH EVERYTHING I THINK IS WRONG" Yeah, as if that makes it more likely I'd be interested in derailing the conversation further. (Other than with snide replies like this) TLDR; Bug diagnosed/fix proposed, thanks to Milan for a good reproducible test case. Could someone contact Lukas and see if he can update the package? Cheers, Henry
