Yanni, Thanks!
> > http://jenkins.lukas-renggli.**ch/view/Seaside%203.0/<http://jenkins.lukas-renggli.ch/view/Seaside%203.0/> > > On that site is a Pier3/Margritte3/Seaside-3.1 build as well. > Oh, maybe I will try that as a starting point. Thanks! > > However, AFAICT, all the builds are based on Pharo-1.3, which may be an > issue for you. I want to use Seaside, Magritte, Fuel (as a back-up storage facility, though primary right now), and Glorp via DBXTalk for relational DB I/O. That's my goal. Perhaps you are right and I am too early at adopting DBXTalk. It looks like it should simplify some of the DB storage. > I build my image from Pharo-1.4, adding Seaside-3.0, Magritte2, Pier2. > I do not need Pier per se. Rather, I simply had no images where the basic Magritte tutorials worked. None of them worked properly right out of the box. But you are saying that Magritte2 in Pharo-1.4, with Seaside 3.0 works together... ... ... so I will try it again. Do you need 1.4, and why? -- if you do not mind sharing. - Let me say: because these configuration problems can be such a pain, especially when one is not aware of the nuances of various packages one might want to adopt, I only recently abandoned my Pharo-1.2 one-click derived image when I had troubles connecting to a DB. I figured it was time to do a complete upgrade. But it has turned into a nightmare, and my project has hit a standstill, ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfFuel) project version: '1.8') >> load. >> > > I use version 1.7, but because I don't want the other packages in the > image, I only load: > > FuelTests-MartinDias.157.mcz > Fuel-MartinDias.479.mcz > Thank you! > > I've not tried the 1.8 version yet. If you're having trouble with Fuel, > you might want to load and run the tests. > In 1.4 Fuel worked "out of the box", but in the Pier based image, it did not. > > > Thanks for any insight you can offer in advance. > > Whenever I add a new framework, I start from my base image which has all > the frameworks that I currently use. Then I load and run the tests for the > new framework I want to use. If there are problems.... > Pending your answers to my query about why you chose 1.4 over 1.3, I will start fresh again. Cheers & Thanks, Cam
