Yes!
Else nobody will ever look and join Opal improvement.

>>> +1 for including only NB and then just bug fixes. No new stuff. 
>>> So...slots and new classbuilder will be for next release. Same for Opal I 
>>> guess. 
>> 
>> No Opal should be in previous as well as Athens.
>> These projects should come back to light. Else this will never happen.
> 
> I think that the thing we did with filesystem in 1.4 was good
> - integrate the detached project 
> - apply the refactorings during development
> 
> then in the next release
> - change tools to use the new infrastructure
> - remove old code
> 
> I think we did almost the same with Zinc, no?


Reply via email to