On Nov 22, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Goubier Thierry wrote: > I've used Pharo 2.0 for teaching on Monday/Tuesday. Apart from a few bugs > here and there, it worked fine (but the bugs were rather annoying to explain > to Smalltalk beginners).
2.0 was shaky. I would have used 1.4 for newbies > At the same time, my production development is on 1.4. > > So I think it could/should go beta soon. I'd be happy if I know some of the > core packages won't change under me :) We will. I want to really stabilize now. Stef > > Thierry > > Le 22/11/2012 08:17, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit : >> sounds good to me. >> Esteban we should do a list of points to fix. >> - Nautilus with trees :) >> - default shortcuts >> - fix criticbrowser (I'm working on it). >> - >> - >> >> Stef >> >>> my proposal so far is: >>> >>> - prepare the vms as "NB ready" (I was planning to work on that next week, >>> using the new infraestructure) >>> - include NB as "ready to use" >>> - include Opal as "preview" >>> >>> No more integrations for 2.0. >>> We will be able to load Athens (since VMs and image will be prepared) with >>> just a simple Metacello configuration. I don't know if including it as >>> "preview" (like opal) Igor, what do you think? >>> >>> I need all next week to prepare that (with Marcus assistance, of course >>> :P)... >>> >>> Are we ok with that? >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> ps: If we don't go to beta next week will be really difficult to release in >>> February (as is stipulated now) >>> >>> >>> On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:47 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 2012-11-21, at 19:41, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for including only NB and then just bug fixes. No new stuff. >>>>>> So...slots and new classbuilder will be for next release. Same for Opal >>>>>> I guess. >>>>> >>>>> No Opal should be in previous as well as Athens. >>>>> These projects should come back to light. Else this will never happen. >>>> >>>> I think that the thing we did with filesystem in 1.4 was good >>>> - integrate the detached project >>>> - apply the refactorings during development >>>> >>>> then in the next release >>>> - change tools to use the new infrastructure >>>> - remove old code >>>> >>>> I think we did almost the same with Zinc, no? >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Thierry Goubier > CEA list > Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués > 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex > France > Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 >
