> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a > user?
because things in this universe don't get done if someone isn't leading it? :D the leader of any project is (a) the curator of that project and (b) the one positioned to better inspire followers if people likes it, people follows the project and/or the guy if someone doesn't like the direction, that person can fork and lead it himself in another direction github got it right, I'm glad smalltalkhub too and it's not about mimicking github (which wouldn't be bad) it's mimicking the way people want to work it's about natural selection applied to software projects at its best makes sense? sebastian o/ PD: if someone abandons a project, no big deal, it will be there hanging out while another fork might be flourishing. Also projects property should be transferrable from one user to another for the cases in which that happens orderly.
