On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And what happens where is isnt't ONE gay? say there are 3 or 4 guys in the > community that manage the project? what should we do? create a user named > after the project? hahaha > > > sorry, s/gay/guy (mixing english writing with spanish pronunciation) > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> yes, you're right, but Norbert point is that, right now, you cannot fork >> the project (and you should be able to do it) >> >> Esteban >> >> >> On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Sebastian Sastre < >> sebast...@flowingconcept.com> wrote: >> >> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a >> user? >> >> >> because things in this universe don't get done if someone isn't leading >> it? :D >> >> the leader of any project is (a) the curator of that project and (b) the >> one positioned to better inspire followers >> >> if people likes it, people follows the project and/or the guy >> >> if someone doesn't like the direction, that person can fork and lead it >> himself in another direction >> >> github got it right, I'm glad smalltalkhub too >> >> and it's not about mimicking github (which wouldn't be bad) it's >> mimicking the way people want to work >> >> it's about natural selection applied to software projects at its best >> >> makes sense? >> >> sebastian <https://about.me/sebastianconcept> >> >> o/ >> >> PD: if someone abandons a project, no big deal, it will be there hanging >> out while another fork might be flourishing. Also projects property should >> be transferrable from one user to another for the cases in which that >> happens orderly. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
