Hi nicolas > Semantic versionning? http://semver.org/
thanks for the pointer. I could follow it. But we should have tool support for that. > In that case, the 3 numbers major.minor.patch are used this way: > > - the last is changed for bugfix only > - the second is changed for new functionality only with 100% backward > compatibility > - the first is changed when backward compatibility is broken so if you have a non working system with number 1.0 and after you get all the tests green because you load the correct dependent library then it means that you should get 1.1. Because making a system working for real is not a patch. Stef > > Nicolas > > 2013/3/3 stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr>: >> >> On Mar 3, 2013, at 9:08 PM, "Torsten Bergmann" <asta...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> Stef wrote: >>>> Pastell is now migrated to SmalltalkHub and has a nice CI job >>> >>> Please note that previously ConfigurationOfPastell >>> had the versions: 1.0, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 and now >> >> where? >> >>> has the versions: 1.0, 1.1., 1.2, 1.3 >>> >>> That broke other configurations that depend for instance on 1.0.4 >> >> this is strange because when I queried the repository I only got >> >> Name: ConfigurationOfPastell-AlexandreBergel.2 >> Author: AlexandreBergel >> Time: 12 September 2012, 11:43:37.215 am >> UUID: ddd4217f-9fd0-234c-9669-e02e8634e984 >> Ancestors: ConfigurationOfPastell-AlexandreBergel.1 >> >> 1.0 : First shoot! >> no tbn.4 and not 5 >> >> Now when I look at it with the MC browser I see more. >> So I redid everything for nothing. Fucking crappy system. >> >> >> and the version was only >> >> baseline10: spec >> <version: '1.0-baseline'> >> >> spec for: #'common' do: [ >> spec blessing: #'baseline'. >> spec repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/Pastell'. >> spec package: 'Pastell'. >> spec group: 'default' with: #('Pastell' ). ]. >> >> so just an illusion. no dependency at all on XMLParser. Then the packages >> pastell-base was wrong since the tests could not work. >> >> >>> and it adds a lot of confusion! >> >> Nice to tell me that I spent my sunday on doing bullshit. :) >> Squeaksource is the confusion and if nobody moves then nothing will ever >> change. >> >> Have a look at the repo on smalltalkhub and you will see that apparently the >> two last files were not given to me >> when I used my ****automatic***** migration script…. scary! >> >> Now if squeaksource does not serve all the files. We should really run away! >> >> >>> Why didnt you just continue with 1.0.5 or 2.0? >> >> Why people started to have 1.0.2 after 1.0? >> What is the reason? >> Then may be we should start also to have >> 1.0.0.0.1 to have enough digits. >> >> I hate this numbering and I see no value beside bad marketing like seaside >> 3.0.2.a >> >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> T. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
