Excellent. We would really like to have magma running on Pharo. Please push
Stef > Hi Thushar, > > Magma's developer mostly uses Squeak, so the latest version of Pharo > that Magma works more or less out-of-the-box on is 1.3. > I made a start on porting it to 1.4, and then 2.0 but then promptly > ran out of time. However, as far as I'm aware the porting should > mostly consist of the change to SystemAnnouncer, and Filesystem as you > mentioned. > Magma has a pretty comprehensive test suite, so it should be > relatively easy to verify any porting effort. > > I know that people seem to be gravitating towards other solutions, as > Stéphane mentioned, but Magma is still an excellent tool, and is > ridiculously simple to use. I like it enough that for my own > projects, I'm still using Pharo 1.3 so I can use it, until the desire > to use 2.0 and beyond finally pushes me into completing my porting > effort ;) > > If you do want to give the porting a go yourself, I'd suggest posting > to the Magma list. Chris is very supportive of porting efforts. > > Regards, > Stuart > > On 4 June 2013 22:32, Thushar G R <thushar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I am new here in this list. I have already asked this question in stack >> overflow, but not much luck. So i thought ill contact the gurus directly. >> >> I am considering Magma to be used for one of my projects , which is nothing >> but a custom game center to connect my game and store user details and >> retrieve it. This would be the first time that i will be using pharo for one >> of my projects ( in fact this is the first time that i am able to decide for >> my self - the client has not preferences in terms of technology selection). >> >> So my concern is this, is Magama upgraded to be used in Pharo 2.0? What if i >> load it and change the SystemChangeNotifiers with SystemAnnouncer and so on >> , will it cause any trouble in the future. I Appreciate any comments for >> this. >> >> >> Regards >> >> thushar >
