On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>> If you do not give us more information we will never be able to fix it. 
>>> And may be 3.0 will still have the problem and you will start using system 
>>> that is 3 year old. 
>>> I can understand that you get in a situation where you cannot do otherwise 
>>> but do not expect 
>>> us to fix magically things.
>>> 
>>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Stef,
>> 
>> For reporting the RFB issue I made a thread
>> (http://forum.world.st/How-do-diagnose-image-locks-up-cpu-100-on-save-td4704639.html)
>> and uploaded a Pharo 2 image to dropbox where if you execute this code:
>> 
>> 
>> RFBServer start
>> Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: false
>> 
>> 
>> The image locks up using the 'pharo' VM and works fine using eliots vm.
>> The uploaded image is Pharo-20619 with only RFB loaded.
> 
> I will check this (after SUG)
after ESUG, I meant :)

btw, I also have productive environments with RFB running... so I will take a 
look to that locking image too. 

> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The other problem I had with Pharo 2 is the ever growing image size I
>> reported here:
>> 
>> http://forum.world.st/development-image-memory-use-180MB-in-Pharo-2-vs-40MB-in-Pharo-1-4-tp4699207.html
>> 
>> I understand this is due to some leaks involving morphs and announcers
>> and things that are fixed in pharo 3 but not pharo 2.
>> 
>> I have not gotten the impression that that fix will be backported, and
>> even if it will it hasn't been yet so because of that and the RFB issue
>> above I can't use Pharo 2 right now.
> 
> this is weird, because is the first time I see a report (well, I saw the 
> other thread too) about this. 
> and Pharo2 is productive since more than 8 months now (and I have some 
> production stuff on it)... and I never seen it. 
> This is likely not for the same reasons as pharo3 leaks (which btw are just 
> partially solved, the leaks are still there). 
> 
> I would like to have that image to take a look, if possible, because is 
> super-weird. 
> 
> Esteban
> 
> ps: I would also like to know about other cases of this problem. 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hope this helps and thanks for following up
>> 
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
> 


Reply via email to