Well, it could be that your machine CPU too old and don't supports
instructions (like SSE)
which VM compiled with.


On 7 November 2013 19:44, PBK Research <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote:

>  Just a little more information. Out of curiosity, I downloaded Pharo 3.0
> and tried it, with the same result - message from Windows says 'Pharo.exe
> has encountered a problem and needs to close'. To complete the set, I
> downloaded Pharo 1.4 and tried it. This time it failed saying 'CogVM.exe
> has encoun....'. I presume all versions now use the Cog VM, and it looks as
> though this machine just won't run it. Is there still a 'traditional' VM I
> can use instead of Cog? It might not be practical, but it would at least
> prove that it is a VM problem. Is there any information about Cog giving
> problems with AMD processors?
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On
> Behalf Of *PBK Research
> *Sent:* 07 November 2013 15:07
>
> *To:* 'Any question about pharo is welcome'
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-users] Why won't my Pharo download run?
>
>  OK. I opened a command line prompt, cd to Pharo 2.0 directory (created
> in today's download), enter 'pharo.exe pharo2.0.image'. Same result -
> immediate failure. I had previously changed the association of the image
> file to the newly downloaded pharo.exe. So I think I must be using the VM
> in today's download.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Igor Stasenko
> *Sent:* 07 November 2013 14:48
> *To:* Any question about pharo is welcome
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-users] Why won't my Pharo download run?
>
>
>
>
> On 7 November 2013 15:31, PBK Research <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>  Thanks. I am using the latest one-click distribution of Pharo,
>> downloaded today from the Pharo website. Presumably that should have the
>> latest VM?
>>
>> yes, but if .image file extension associated with wrong version of VM
> binary, which you installed previously (as you mentioned), it won't
> automagically use proper one.
>  unless you run vm from command line e.g.:
> pharo.exe myimage.image
> or change the association to use different vm.
>
>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Igor Stasenko
>> *Sent:* 07 November 2013 13:53
>> *To:* Any question about pharo is welcome
>> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-users] Why won't my Pharo download run?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 November 2013 14:18, PBK Research <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello!
>>>
>>> I have a problem with running Pharo 2.0 on one of my machines. I have
>>> two machines, both running Windows XP with SP3. On one of them I have a
>>> successful load of Pharo (actually it's a distribution of the Moose system,
>>> but that is just an application built on Pharo 2.0). This loads
>>> successfully when I double click on pharo.exe. On the other machine, the
>>> same action produces an immediate message: 'Pharo.exe has encountered a
>>> problem and needs to close'. Just in case this was some problem with Moose,
>>> I have just downloaded the latest one-click installation of Pharo 2.0 for
>>> Windows. This displays exactly the same behaviour - an immediate fail when
>>> I try to start it.
>>>
>>> I have tried to work out what may be different between the two machines.
>>> The one which will run Pharo has an Intel Celeron processor, the other an
>>> AMD Athlon XP (yes, they are both pretty ancient!), but I can't see why
>>> that should make any difference. The one curious thing is that Windows
>>> Explorer displays the type of the Pharo2.0.image file as 'Squeak image
>>> file'. There is an old version of Squeak installed on that machine; could
>>> that have any effect?
>>>
>>> I am a bit flummoxed by all this. Does anyone have any suggestions about
>>> how to diagnose the problem?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> If you using too old VM , it simply does not supports an image format,
>> which pharo 2.0 uses.
>> But there could be different reasons.. a first step towards to solution
>> is to use VM for pharo, which we maintain and use..
>>
>>
>>
>>>  Many thanks
>>>
>>> Peter Kenny
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply via email to