> Am 13.03.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Tommaso Dal Sasso <tommaso.dalsa...@gmail.com>: > > As one of the few (maybe the only user) of Tide, I can say that it is > powerful but painful ;-) > Amber is changing (quite) fast, and the current version of Tide is not usable > with the default version. I made some small changes to make Tide work with > the current setup of Amber, but still there are a couple of "gotchas" that > are needed to make it work. > > I wanted to write something about that, but I am still in deep development > phase. If you are really interested, I may help you setup an example project. > However, as Esteban said, think twice if this is what you need. Tide is quite > powerful, but unless you don't need strong integration with javascript > libraries Seaside is probably easier. > Thanks. That's something I (don't) wanted to hear. :) Maybe it is because there aren't that much amber users and there are (of course) even less users of amber+tide. I personally loved the idea when first encountering tide. But I know as well there are gotchas.
thanks, Norbert > Tommaso > > > On 13/03/15 14:51, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> As one of the authors of Tide, I wouldn’t recommend to use it today… unless >> you are planning to maintain it too, because atm I do not have time to do it >> and Nico (the other/main author is not working on smalltalk anymore… nor >> amber or pharo). >> Instead, I would use Seaside+Reef :P >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 12 Mar 2015, at 15:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >>> >>> For an upcoming project I'm thinking about what technology to use. I think >>> it will be seaside or amber+tide. For the latter I would like to have some >>> experience reports. >>> >>> Is anyone of you using tide and what is your experience with it? >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> Norbert >>> >>> >> > >
