> On 14 Mar 2015, at 09:05, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 13 Mar 2015, at 20:36, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >> >>>> Am 13.03.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> As one of the authors of Tide, I wouldn’t recommend to use it today… >>>> unless you are planning to maintain it too, because atm I do not have time >>>> to do it and Nico (the other/main author is not working on smalltalk >>>> anymore… nor amber or pharo). >>>> Instead, I would use Seaside+Reef :P >>>> >>> Is Reef better maintained than Tide? :P >> >> Yes and we should get a documentation. > > Yes :P > here is the thing: I have far too many children/projects so I decided to keep > maintaining just two… and I picked the two I think are contributions more > important to community: Voyage and Reef. > Also they have the advantage (for me) of being 100% Pharo (for me, this is a > big constraint to work on Tide right now: I do not have time to keep the > track if two communities). > All other projects (Mars, Storm, etc.) will sleep until… well, until someday > I have insomnia and I want to work on something different :) > > Esteban
Excellent decision. Pushing out projects into open source is one (easy) thing, sticking with them, supporting them for years another (but only then become they really valuable). One should choose wisely. > >>> >>> Norbert >>> >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>>> On 12 Mar 2015, at 15:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For an upcoming project I'm thinking about what technology to use. I >>>>> think it will be seaside or amber+tide. For the latter I would like to >>>>> have some experience reports. >>>>> >>>>> Is anyone of you using tide and what is your experience with it? >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Norbert
