Le 04/04/2015 18:02, stepharo a écrit :
Thierry
this means that generating ring objects would help you?
Maybe. Or maybe unifying Ring with what RB already does with its models
(RBClass, etc...), and ensuring that Opal can work with those (at least
do the bindings part, count the literals, etc...).
I feel like Pharo has three competing ways of modeling software items:
MCDefinition stuff, Ring, RB stuff.
Thierry
I guess so.
stef
Le 30/3/15 16:25, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
A use case:
the ability to test and debug the code generation part of SmaCC.
SmaCC, when compiling a parser, generates dozens of classes and
hundreds of methods, some of those very long, as a sequence of
refactorings (and optimise them).
Then SmaCC apply them all in one step.
I'd dream of having a virtual environment where I could test-compile
and check all those methods, via a system browser, before they are
compiled.
Thierry
2015-03-30 9:10 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr
<mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr>>:
> On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo <steph...@free.fr
<mailto:steph...@free.fr>> wrote:
>
> Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes
definition in an environment (that can be the default one) but
that can be the one
> I want and specified from the outside of the compiler.
For installing, it is the ClassInstaller that does that (and yes,
it has an environment).
What the compiler does not have is to look up references e.g. to
symbols regarding to an environment, but that is because we
don’t have that concept right now in the system in general.
globals/class vars are requested from the class (which defines its
environment).
So in general, we first need a use case, else it is not clear what
to do…
Marcus
