I like the idea I read recently about an easy way to create images so we
can tell what Pharo means to us. I started using Moose 5.0 and 5.1
exclusively, but now with the release of Pharo 4 and the incorporation
of the GTPlayground and Spotter on it, I'm trying to put the data
visualization stuff I would like to use on my daily experience (Roassal,
GT Tools, scrapping and some databases). Hopefully we will learn how to
reach as community that modular moldable, loadable tools for a more
diverse set of images, without having the kitchen sink. Both approaches
are valuable.
Cheers,
Offray
El 03/05/15 a las 10:31, Alexandre Bergel escribió:
Hi Andy,
I personally almost solely use Moose, as it contains many of the tools I need.
Let us know about your experience with Moose.
Cheers
Alexandre
Le 2 mai 2015 à 17:02, Andy Burnett <andy.burn...@knowinnovation.com> a écrit :
Thanks Ben, and Cyril.
I liked Mariano's approach, and I will play with that. However, I think the
suggestion about using Moose may be exactly what I need.
I have been playing with Mathematica a lot lately, and I really appreciated the
fact that you got the kitchen sink with it.
What I was wondering - taking Cyril's comment into account - is whether there
is an argument for producing a kitchen sink image which contains the stable
versions of all the key tools. Obviously, that requires some
discussion/analysis of what the key tools are, but it shouldn't be impossible
to do.
In the meantime, I am off to play with Moose :-)
Cheers
Andy
