Stef,
you're shooting the wrong man! ;-) The crime was committed in your team
;-))))
See you in Brescia
Joachim
Am 30.06.15 um 19:19 schrieb stepharo:
Le 30/6/15 14:39, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de a écrit :
Ah, Okay, you are mentioning the one and only one case in which this
could make sense.... ;-)
Something like
stream next ifNil: [^stream next].
so ugly.
Please we should not teach how to do exception with blocks :)
So there may be cases where the two sends do not return the same
result. But that is, of course, not what the OP suggested.
Nevertheless, I was too fast in criticizing ;-)
I would consider code like that "less easy" to maintain, however.
Nice thinking Kata ;-)
Joachim
Am 30.06.15 um 14:22 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano:
ah yeah :)
I assumed
first "something aMsg" ~= second "something aMsg”
In case is the same, the correct way is as you say:
^ something aMsg ifNil: [ anotherResult ]
(sorry, he :P)
On 30 Jun 2015, at 13:43, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de wrote:
Am 30.06.15 um 13:40 schrieb Peter Uhnák:
Make sense if there's code in between.
not sure what you're saying. I mean, sending the message twice
makes sense if you already know the outcome? Hmmm...
something aMsg ifNil:[ ^ something aMsg ]. "yay for guards!"
"much more code"
^ aNotherResult
Peter
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de
D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com
Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de
D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com
Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1
