I was wondering if github interface could help here to make it much more powerful
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:43 PM Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > well… maintenance is (usually) just run the generation process. > Some months ago Guille made a simplified version and I was thinking on > just load it and execute it… they go to sleep :) > > the reasons for pharodocs to be there are not so important and nothing > will change a lot if removed. But I would keep it anyway, if possible. > > Esteban > > On 11 Jan 2016, at 14:37, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > > I never used Pharodoc, I don’t really see the point. And apparently I am > not alone. So, I have a provocative question: why don’t you just remove it? > > It is broken now and it will take energy to fix, and this energy can be > much better spent elsewhere. Plus it will take maintenance time and energy > at some point in the future, it is probable that it will break again at > some point, since the www behaves like this. Just get rid of this burden. > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:28, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > yeah i can confirm that as well, but i never tried to resize the panels > before, but frankly its not a huge deal, phardoc does not offer anything > more than what the pharo image already offers and is many times less > flexible. I used only once when i was on vacations and wanted to take a > look at a couple of things. > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:19 PM David Allouche <da...@allouche.net> wrote: > >> Yes, that's what I talked about in the first place. >> >> Here's the screenshot I should have included at first. See, no method >> names. >> >> <PastedGraphic-1.png> >> >> >> Also, if one tries resizing the panes, things start breaking in visually >> interesting ways… >> >> >> <PastedGraphic-2.png> >> >> > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- > > Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University > of Chile > >
