Personally I would prefer if Esteban kept working on documenting the new FFI. Thats a top priority doc wise, the rest can wait.
Στις Δευ, 11 Ιαν 2016 - 15:57 ο χρήστης Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> έγραψε: > > I better understand the reason for existence of pharodocs, thanks! I also > understand that you want to keep it. > > BUT: please keep in mind that having bad documentation is actually worse > than not having any documentation at all. So ideally you would regenerate > the site tonight before you go to sleep. :-) > > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:41, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > well… maintenance is (usually) just run the generation process. > Some months ago Guille made a simplified version and I was thinking on > just load it and execute it… they go to sleep :) > > the reasons for pharodocs to be there are not so important and nothing > will change a lot if removed. But I would keep it anyway, if possible. > > Esteban > > On 11 Jan 2016, at 14:37, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > > I never used Pharodoc, I don’t really see the point. And apparently I am > not alone. So, I have a provocative question: why don’t you just remove it? > > It is broken now and it will take energy to fix, and this energy can be > much better spent elsewhere. Plus it will take maintenance time and energy > at some point in the future, it is probable that it will break again at > some point, since the www behaves like this. Just get rid of this burden. > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- > > Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University > of Chile >
