Hi 2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com>:
> No, it is not. It has hard wired bindings from certain names to morphic > adapters, but only if you don't actually specify the target calss. > In other words, if in your #specLayout you specify a name that has a > binding, then the binding will be used; if there is no such binding, then > the class will be instantiated directly. > > So for example if you specify: > * LabelAdapter -> there is binding from LabelAdapter to > MorphicLabelAdapter, so MorphicLabelAdapter will be instantiated > * MorphicLabelAdapter -> there are no bindings for this name, so it will > be instantiated directly > * CocoaLabelAdapter -> there are no bindings for this name, so it will be > instantiated directly > But we should not reference directly platform specific widgets when we define spec layout. Otherwise we will be forced to copy every layout method (like #defaultSpec) for each platform. And it breaks goal of Spec to be able open application with different backends without code modification. I am sure you know what I wrote. So probably I not understand what you mean.
