On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:22:46PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > Hi > > 2017-04-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com>: > > > No, it is not. It has hard wired bindings from certain names to morphic > > adapters, but only if you don't actually specify the target calss. > > In other words, if in your #specLayout you specify a name that has a > > binding, then the binding will be used; if there is no such binding, then > > the class will be instantiated directly. > > > > So for example if you specify: > > * LabelAdapter -> there is binding from LabelAdapter to > > MorphicLabelAdapter, so MorphicLabelAdapter will be instantiated > > * MorphicLabelAdapter -> there are no bindings for this name, so it will > > be instantiated directly > > * CocoaLabelAdapter -> there are no bindings for this name, so it will be > > instantiated directly > > > > But we should not reference directly platform specific widgets when we > define spec layout. Otherwise we will be forced to copy every layout method > (like #defaultSpec) for each platform. > And it breaks goal of Spec to be able open application with different > backends without code modification. > > I am sure you know what I wrote. So probably I not understand what you mean.
I was describing how it is possible to do it _now_, not how it ideally should be done (because there's no other way right now)... we will change this, because we will also need a better way for Bloc. So Pharo7 again :) Peter
