"It's Smalltalk. Read the code, Luke."? On Oct 6, 2017 08:55, "horrido" <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I received this comment from someone who complained: > > *What about the lack of documentation? From time to time I’ve checked some > SmallTalk implementations like Squeak, GNU-Smalltalk and now Pharo. Of > these, only GNU-SmallTalk appears to have a free, official programming > guide > and core library reference that any serious programmer expects from a > language. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual-base/html_node/* > > I pointed to Pharo's documentation but then he came back with: > > *Then show me a link of the free, maintained reference documentation for > the > classes that form “the core library”, like this one for Python > (https://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html)* > > It's true, most Smalltalks do not have a core library reference, not even > VisualWorks! So what is the proper response to this complaint? > > Thanks. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html > >
