Then in a Metacello configuration should I reference the hash git commit or a tag in a version method? For example, an extract from Deep in Pharo:
ConfigurationOfCoolToolSet>>version02: spec > <version: '0.2' imports: #('0.2-baseline' )> > spec for: #common do: [ > spec blessing: #beta. > spec > package: 'CoolToolSet-Core' with: 'CoolToolSet-Core-AlanJay.1'; > package: 'CoolToolSet-Tests' with: 'CoolToolSet-Tests-AlanJay.1'; > project: 'CoolBrowser default' with: '1.3'; > project: 'CoolBrowser Tests' with: '1.3']. > In this case 'CoolToolSet-Core-AlanJay.1' would be changed by 'CoolToolSet-Core-<git_hash>'? On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > In iceberg you can specify > - latest version when you do not specify anything > - a version (but it should be a git tag so you should save you code > with a tag - iceberg does not support it right now but you can do it > with git) > - the hash of your git commit. > > Does it answer your question? > Stef > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > How are packages versions computed in Iceberg? > > > > I am looking at the Metacello documentation at 'Deep in Pharo', it says I > > can define dependencies at package level and it uses the following > format to > > identify versions: <dev_name.versionNumber>; which I think is a pattern > used > > by Monticello, right? However, I can't figure what is the equivalent (if > > any) in Iceberg. > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > Vitor > >