On 4 March 2018 at 20:08, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote: > Le 04/03/2018 à 11:13, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > >> In our community, Pavel is the person that has the bigger experience on >> shrinking process images. I followed his work for years and I know the >> fragility of the process. Basically each new addition/removal was breaking >> it and needing dependency tracking, etc. Now is the opposite: you just add >> what you want, and you are sure the resulting image is a) healthy and b) >> identical when running. >> >> > Indeed it is fragile. And given the latest image size, not sure it could > lead to satisfactory results. >
I understood that to mean that getting a minimal image via automated stripping was more fragile than bootstrapping, and with bootstrapping we are now on a better path. And Pharo is transitioning a few tools. Nautilus-->Calypso and Morphic-->Bloc. Obviously old and new overlap for a time. So it should get better. cheers -ben
