Considering the fact that votes are so precious and, as Brad points out, there has been no visible priority given to them. I'd say the 19 bugs with over 5 votes should be tackled first.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=votes&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&type0-0-0=greaterthan&value0-0-0=5 Then possibly upping the count could be considered beneficial. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > Following the 64-bit release we'll focus generally on fixing bugs. I am > mulling over a good strategy for that, and I think part of it would be to > use community input. > > We currently have 10 votes limit per user. This number was meaningful when D > had few users, but now that there are more users and reporters (and bug > reports, heh) we can start leveraging the power of statistics. > > To that end, I think it would help if we increased the number of votes per > person from 10 to 100. That would help us get a smooth function of the pain > that people are incurring for each bug. > > Let me know of what you think. > > > Andrei > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > -- Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. - George Bernard Shaw _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
