-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:19:25 +0200, Karasik, Vitaly wrote:
> > After reading EULA (http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_2-1.html) it seems like > > they use GPL license. > > So we can buy one RH AS (ES,WS) box and install system for tens machines? > > If yes, it's more or less the same model as we have for "regular" RH - we can > > install system for free; download and install updates for free; > > > > and we must pay only when we > > 1) need RH support > > 2) use RHN > > > > > > I am right? > > >How do you interpret paragraph I. A. section 4 (REPORTING AND AUDIT)? > > They are speaking about RHN, IMHO - because rpm's are under GPL or similar > (BSD,PERL,...) licenses. What has GPL to do with the terms in aforementioned paragraph? - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+gIz70iMVcrivHFQRAmUHAJsEuPJ5ZPdazImbMbxBbXm9sHvppQCghuy5 U63c8PqmQLLfSFkfxMDkT6M= =Qnd1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
