-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Mar 2003 21:00:21 -0800, Michael Knepher wrote:
> > > Next B. How does the errata support in the new RHL compare to that of > > > the old RHL? Has the support indeed become shortened? > > > > Yes. This was announced in December, not just now. > > Prior to that EOL "clarification" (at least one year, longer for popular > releases), what was Red Hat's publicly stated EOL policy, or were they > making it up as they went along? Prior to that, they had a highly confusing statement on the errata overview page. IIRC, it boiled down to something like supported is the current major release cycle, the previous release cycle and the latest release of the cycle prior to that. So, at the time of 8.0, 7.x and 6.2 were still supported. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+gZUh0iMVcrivHFQRApqmAJ4tZWCsTrf57I4fYuCWrN2qFRv78gCfUzSW 3jiZZzzaHLXSDRXEB3KBdOE= =OTlM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
