On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:13:44PM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote: > Peter Bowen wrote: > > > >Version | Release Date | EOL Date > >--------------------------------- > >4.2 | May 1997 | May 2000 > >5.2 | Oct 1998 | Nov 2001 > >6.2 | March 2000 | Mar 2003 > > Is that supposed to be first of the month, end of the month or the day > of initial release?
The errata web site (http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/) lists specific dates. For RHL 6.2, for example, the exact date is March 31. You may (note: "may" not "will", I don't know for sure) see a few advisories after that date with packages for RHL 6.2, but that would depend on the timing of when the process for building/testing/pushing the particular erratum was started. > Also note the last errta I see released is the RHSA-2003:051 - Security > Advisory from 26 March 2003 for krb5. The errata packaged includes RHL > 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.0 for x86 and ia64 (where appropriate). > > It does not include Alpha packages, whose last errata was RHSA-2002:222 > on 2002-11-25. The same is true for the sparc packages. The web site doesn't seem to have the detail there, but the posting to redhat-announce-list from December [1] declared that all versions for Alpha and Sparc were immediately EOL. Cheers, Nalin [1] https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-announce-list/2002-December/002778.html -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
