What he said.

Ron L

-----Original Message-----
From: phono-l-bounces at oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew Baron
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:26 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 30 erratic speed

What a great bunch of replies!  Good suggestions, all.

Even though many of us have been working on these wonderful time- 
machines for years, and have accrued mechanical intuition as well as  
experience, it never hurts to be reminded of all the possibilities.   
Even though I didn't post the original inquiry, I recognize the value  
of all the feedback and will print out a line-item summary of the  
broad range of possible issues, to post in my workshop as a reminder  
and checklist.  In focusing on the minutiae, we sometimes overlook the  
obvious.

Best to all,
Andy Baron
Santa Fe


On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Ron L wrote:

> The test you suggest is a good one.  I'll do it for sure.  However,  
> I am
> pretty sure that the spring could give sufficient energy for correct  
> speed
> at one point (coils slide by one another) and then, as it uncoils,  
> encounter
> an area of sticky old grease, impeding proper release of energy,  
> especially
> since we are dealing with century old springs and equally old  
> lubricant.
>
> Ron L
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: phono-l-bounces at oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-bounces at oldcrank.org 
> ] On
> Behalf Of Robert Wright
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 11:43 PM
> To: Antique Phonograph List
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 30 erratic speed
>
> Last thought -- listen to a cylinder you know well and wait for the  
> speed to
>
> drop.  Back the reproducer up about 20 or 30 grooves and see if it  
> does it
> in the same spot, within about 3 or 4 grooves.  If so, it's not the
> mainspring, or anything other than something the carriage encounters  
> near
> that physical location along the feedscrew, whether the contact  
> point of
> half-nut to feedscrew, or the shaft the carriage rides along the  
> length of
> the playback.  Forgive me for speaking out of school, but if it were  
> the
> mainspring, it just sems like there'd be no point at which you had  
> reliable
> speed.  These guys are the experts, but at least give the 30 this
> 'repeatable error' test first.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Danckaert" <kend at lemur.org>
> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 3:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 30 erratic speed
>
>
>> Your problem is in the mainspring.  It needs to be pulled and ALL  
>> the old
>> lubrication removed.  4"0" steel wool and wd40 will do that.   
>> Relube and
>> put
>> the spring back in.  That will get rid of the problem.  DON'T soak  
>> it in
>> kerosene or some other short cut to cleaning.  The old stuff has  
>> got to
>> come
>> off the spring.
>>
>> Ken Danckaert
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Ron L'Herault <lherault at bu.edu>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, gang, it is time to tap into the lists' wisdom.  I'm working  
>>> on an
>>> Amberola 30.  The hook came unsoldered and the reproducer needed a
>>> rebuild.
>>> Those two easy repairs (the spring was in the case)completed, I  
>>> tested
>>> the
>>> phonograph and found that the speed is a bit erratic. It will  
>>> sound nice,
>>> then slow just a bit then return to speed for a while only to slow  
>>> again.
>>> The carriage moves easily and the horn bobbles and rotates as it  
>>> should.
>>> The governor is lubricated and the pad has been oiled.  There is no
>>> evidence
>>> of crud or damage to the governor disk.  There were a few teeth on  
>>> the
>>> large
>>> hear that had a bit of damage but a bit of judicious filing has  
>>> cured the
>>> noise the damage created, and besides, the speed variation is more  
>>> random
>>> than the cycle of the gear noise.  I'm thinking that the  
>>> mainspring may
>>> need
>>> to be removed, cleaned and re-lubricated but I thought I might see  
>>> if
>>> there
>>> is anything else I missed before tearing it apart.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ron L
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Phono-L mailing list
>>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phono-L mailing list
>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to